Abstract

How do humans coordinate their intentions, goals and motor behaviors when performing joint action tasks? Recent experimental evidence suggests that resonance processes in the observer's motor system are crucially involved in our ability to understand actions of others’, to infer their goals and even to comprehend their action-related language. In this paper, we present a control architecture for human–robot collaboration that exploits this close perception-action linkage as a means to achieve more natural and efficient communication grounded in sensorimotor experiences. The architecture is formalized by a coupled system of dynamic neural fields representing a distributed network of neural populations that encode in their activation patterns goals, actions and shared task knowledge. We validate the verbal and nonverbal communication skills of the robot in a joint assembly task in which the human–robot team has to construct toy objects from their components. The experiments focus on the robot's capacity to anticipate the user's needs and to detect and communicate unexpected events that may occur during joint task execution.

Highlights

  • New generations of robotic systems are starting to share the same workspace with humans

  • In the following we briefly describe the main functionalities of the layered control architecture for joint action

  • We focus the discussion of results on the action simulation (ASL) and action execution layer (AEL)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

New generations of robotic systems are starting to share the same workspace with humans. They are supposed to play a beneficial role in the life of ordinary people by directly collaborating with them on common tasks. Humans are experts in coordinating their actions with others to reach a shared goal (Sebanz et al, 2006). The co-actor immediately grasps a screw-driver to hand it over and subsequently holds the components that are to be attached with the screw. In familiar tasks, such fluent team performance is very often achieved with little or no direct communication. The fact that something might go wrong in the joint action and the reason for the conflict should be communicated to the co-actor

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.