Abstract

For local governments and municipalities, both urban and energy planning are required to make the transition to more energy efficient cities with lower carbon emissions. However, energy planning and urban planning are usually under the responsibility of different departments and have their own planning processes. When dealing with energy plans, this separation could lead to a less effective impact on cities in reaching climate goals since a lack of coordination may result in different strategies set out by the two plans. In consideration of the fact that space heating dominates the energy use in buildings, this study has a focus on urban heating systems in the building sector. We propose an integrative municipal heat planning methodology investigating which features of the urban planning process that could be integrated into a spatially explicit energy systems model and how. The proposed methodology is then applied to a specific case: the heating system in the municipality of Lyngby-Taarbæk, Denmark. The inclusion of stakeholders from both the heat and urban planning departments in the case study enabled us to reflect on their preferences and expectations for the future heating system. Finally, the applicability of the methodology and the application results are discussed and compared to other methods.

Highlights

  • Urban authorities are recognized as important stakeholders in urban energy system planning processes since they often have better knowledge and understanding than national authorities on the local context and implementation of efficient energy policy for the area [1,2,3,4,5]

  • While the previous studies tend to consider integrating energy aspects into urban planning process, this study addresses the converse, i.e. integrating features of urban planning into energy systems model

  • One of the benefits of integrating urban and heat planning processes at the municipal level is that it supports a coherent urban heating system planning process through tackling the problem of local energy transition

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Urban authorities are recognized as important stakeholders in urban energy system planning processes since they often have better knowledge and understanding than national authorities on the local context and implementation of efficient energy policy for the area [1,2,3,4,5]. Energy planning and urban planning are usually under the responsibility of different departments and have their own planning processes. This separation could lead to a less effective impact on cities in reaching climate goals since a lack of coordination may result in different and sometimes conflictual strategies set out by those individual planning processes [6]

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call