Abstract

Work-integrated learning is crucial for student development, providing hands-on experience in industry placements or project-based learning at higher educational institutions. This article evaluates the impact of adopting a Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) process in work-integrated learning software development projects at a University of Technology. Comparing two student projects, the waterfall model resulted in substandard conversion between class diagrams and route classes, while the agile model allowed frequent reviews and modifications, resulting in alignment between class diagrams and route classes. The key difference was the absence of clear directional indicators and comprehensive descriptions of class relationships. It is recommended that students adopt an appropriate SDLC model that meets their specific project needs within a work-integrated learning environment.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.