Abstract

The Chinese official rhubarb (COR), from the genus Rheum, is listed in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia, while many rhubarb plant sources include in the Tibetan rhubarb (TR) are not attributable to Chinese Pharmacopoeia. Tibetan rhubarb is widely used as a natural medicine in Tibet; however, the difference in plant endogenous phytochemicals between the COR and TR remains largely unclear. To establish a method for evaluating the chemical composition and metabolic difference between COR and TR. Using UHPLC-QTOF-MS/MS, we established a strategy to quickly and comprehensively identify the chemical components of COR and TR. Furthermore, multivariate statistical analysis was applied to identify the significant metabolic differences between the two. In total, 209 chemical compounds, including 51 anthraquinones, 44 stilbenes, 26 tannins, 52 acyl glycosides, and 36 other compounds, were identified using the data mining strategy. Importantly, 47 compounds may be the potential new compounds, while 35 significant metabolic differences were revealed between COR and TR. This study offers significant insight into the chemical composition and differences between COR and TR that could be used to develop their varieties and clinical applications.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.