Abstract

Small scale fisheries are critically important for the provision of food security, livelihoods, and economic development for billions of people. Yet, most of these fisheries appear to not be achieving either fisheries or conservation goals, with respect to creating healthier oceans that support more fish, feed more people and improve livelihoods. Research and practical experience have elucidated many insights into how to improve the performance of small-scale fisheries. Here, we present lessons learned from five case studies of small-scale fisheries in Cuba, Mexico, the Philippines, and Belize. The major lessons that arise from these cases are: 1) participatory processes empower fishers, increase compliance, and support integration of local and scientific knowledge; 2) partnership across sectors improves communication and community buy-in; 3) scientific analysis can lead fishery reform and be directly applicable to co-management structures. These case studies suggest that a fully integrated approach that implements a participatory process to generate a scientific basis for fishery management (e.g., data collection, analysis, design) and to design management measures among stakeholders will increase the probability that small-scale fisheries will implement science-based management and improve their performance.

Highlights

  • Small-scale fisheries are critically important globally for supporting local economies, poverty alleviation, and food security (Berkes et al, 2001; FAO, 2012)

  • Recognizing that a combination of fisheries governance, scientific assessment and science-based fishing mortality control are the step to prevent overfishing or stock collapse, the government initiated an effort to develop an adaptive management framework (AMF) for its conch and lobster fisheries that is designed for data-limited circumstances (Fujita et al, 2017)

  • By elucidating attributes of successful small-scale fishery reform efforts and mainstreaming this dialogue, we can begin to understand what conditions result in success

Read more

Summary

Emilie Novaczek contributed to the review of Brice Trouillet

Specialty section: This article was submitted to Marine Conservation and Sustainability, a section of the journal Frontiers in Marine Science. The major lessons that arise from these cases are: (1) participatory processes empower fishers, increase compliance, and support integration of local and scientific knowledge; (2) partnership across sectors improves communication and community buy-in; (3) scientific analysis can lead fishery reform and be directly applicable to co-management structures. These case studies suggest that a fully integrated approach that implements a participatory process to generate a scientific basis for fishery management (e.g., data collection, analysis, design) and to design management measures among stakeholders will increase the probability that small-scale fisheries will implement science-based management and improve their performance

INTRODUCTION
CASE STUDIES
Multispecies major regions in Demersal fish
Single species Lobster Conch
LESSONS LEARNED
CONCLUSIONS
Findings
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call