Abstract
AbstractEcological stability encompasses multiple dimensions of functional and compositional responses to environmental change. Though no single stability dimension used in isolation can fully reflect the overall response to environmental change, a common vulnerability assessment that integrates simultaneously across multiple stability components is highly desirable for ecological risk assessment.We develop both functional and compositional counterparts of a novel, integrative metric of overall ecological vulnerability (OEV). We test the framework with data from a modularized experiment replicated in five lakes over two seasons, examining functional and compositional responses to both pulse and press disturbances across three trophic groups. OEV is measured as the area under the curve integrated over the entire observation period, with the curve delimiting the difference between the disturbance treatment and undisturbed parallel controls, expressed either as the log response ratio of biomass (functional OEV) or community dissimilarity index (compositional OEV).Both, functional and compositional OEV correlated negatively with functional and compositional ‘resistance’, ‘temporal stability’ and ‘final/extent of recovery’ following both pulse and press disturbances, though less so with ‘resilience’ following a pulse disturbance. We also found a positive correlation between functional and compositional OEV, which reveals the potential to also evaluate the intricate linkage between biodiversity and functional change.Our findings demonstrate that OEV comprises a robust framework to: (a) capture simultaneously multiple functional and compositional stability components, and (b) quantify the functional consequences of biodiversity change. Our results provide the basis for an overarching framework for quantifying the overall vulnerability of ecosystems to environmental change, opening new possibilities for ecological risk assessment and management.Synthesis. Ecological stability comprises multiple dimensions that together encapsulate how ecosystems respond to environmental change. Considering these multiple aspects of stability simultaneously often poses a problem in environmental assessments, which frequently require overarching indicators of risk or vulnerability. While an analysis of multiple dimensions allows for deeper exploration of mechanisms, here we develop and test a new univariate indicator that integrates stability aspects under a broad range of disturbance regimes. Using a modularized experiment in Swedish lakes, we show that this integrative measure captures multiple stability dimensions reflecting compositional and functional vulnerability and their relationships between them.
Highlights
Ecological stability is the general framework for understanding the inherent property of ecosystems to remain unchanged (Pimm, 1991)
Our study reveals several strengths of overall ecological vulnerability (OEV) as a potential management tool for ecological risk assessment
A critical advantage of using the OEV metric is its strong connection with a diverse range of stability components for both pulse and press disturbances
Summary
Ecological stability is the general framework for understanding the inherent property of ecosystems to remain unchanged (Pimm, 1991). Journal of Ecology e.g. this principle used for other stability components in Hillebrand et al, 2018 and White et al, 2020) Understanding these interrelationships is important because biodiversity change in terms of species composition (i.e. compositional turnover) is a major mechanistic basis to explain the relationship between species richness and functional stability over time (Cleland, 2011). A recent meta-analysis spanning 508 field experiments globally distributed across marine, terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems found that functional recovery from pulse disturbances can be achieved with or without compositional recovery (Hillebrand & Kunze, 2020) These results strongly indicate the need to integrate both functional and compositional responses in the study of the overall ecological vulnerability (OEV) of a system if we are to understand and predict the broader consequences of biodiversity change for ecosystems (Pimm et al, 2019). We exemplify the generality of the metric in the context of a modularized experiment across space and time, exposing it to considerable variation in local environmental conditions
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.