Abstract
This dissertation investigates the effects of human factors (HF) of the working environment on the performance of an operation system. Poor HF design of the workplace interrupts the balance of the working environment and reduces employees' overall work performance creating a substantial economic burden on organizations. This thesis focuses on integrating HF aspects into performance optimization models of the serial system. For this reason, a modeling framework has been developed for hierarchical consideration of HF consequences at the individual, workstation and system levels. The developed framework provides a road map for the three analytical phases of this PhD research. In the first analytical phase, a two-state Markov chain is developed to quantify the connection between Work-related Ill Health (WIH) risk factors (ergonomic conditions in the workplace) and employee health-state in a probabilistic way. Subsequently, an optimization model is developed to minimize the total cost of the assembly system with regard to employee health-related productivity loss. Numerical results indicate that there is between 0.5% and 8% difference in the optimal cost of the system with and without including HF effects. In the second analytical phase, a three health-state Markov chain models the connection between HF aspects of the workplace and the employees' work-related productivity and quality variations. Results show between 0.02% and 32% increase for the optimal total cost when both employee productivity and quality losses due to poor HF design of the workplace are integrated into the optimization model. In the third analytical phase, the uncertainty involved in customer demand is considered by developing a two-regime switching model, using a pentanomial lattice. The developed modeling approach investigates the effects of both work-related employee performance variation and demand behavior on the optimal cost of the serial assembly system. Results show that a prediction of the demand distribution throughout the product life cycle is necessary to reduce the over/under cost estimation of the system, due to the stochastic behavior of the demand. This research opens a new window for considering HF intervention not only as occupational health and safety but also as operation improvement method leading to design safer and more efficient systems.
Highlights
1.1 Research MotivationWorking Environment (WE) includes physical, psychosocial, and organizational aspects of working conditions that influence work and the involved humans (Rose et al 2013)
Compared with the optimization model without including Human Factors (HF), the numerical analysis has demonstrated a substantial difference in the minimized total cost of the assembly system when Work–related Ill Health (WIH) risk factor effects are considered
These HF–related underestimations are usually ignored in the existing optimization model which may result in inaccurate performance prediction for the company
Summary
1.1 Research MotivationWorking Environment (WE) includes physical, psychosocial, and organizational aspects of working conditions that influence work and the involved humans (Rose et al 2013). Previous studies show that a major portion of these expenses comes from employee absenteeism and performance variation (productivity and quality loss at work) costs which are usually paid by companies (e.g., Hendrick 2003; Rose et al 2013). Human resources are involved in many stages of manufacturing systems, their health–related performance variations have been infrequently considered in Operations Management Performance Optimization (OMPO) models (Neumann and Dul 2010). OM studies rarely include causes and effects of work–related health problems. This approach usually prevents Human Factors (HF), from playing a critical role in system design and operation planning. The operation systems are usually sub–optimized without considering work–related human illness effects (e.g., Dul et al 2012). Integrating causes and consequences of employee work–related injuries and disorders into OMPO models remains a research gap
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.