Abstract

Risk assessments in volcanic contexts are complicated by the multi-hazard nature of both unrest and eruption phases, which frequently occur over a wide range of spatial and temporal scales. As an attempt to capture the multi-dimensional and dynamic nature of volcanic risk, we developed an integrAteD VolcanIc risk asSEssment (ADVISE) model that focuses on two temporal dimensions that authorities have to address in a volcanic context: short-term emergency management and long-term risk management. The output of risk assessment in the ADVISE model is expressed in terms of potential physical, functional, and systemic damage, determined by combining the available information on hazard, exposed systems and vulnerability. The ADVISE model permits qualitative, semi-quantitative and quantitative risk assessment depending on the final objective and on the available information. The proposed approach has evolved over a decade of study on the volcanic island of Vulcano (Italy), where recent signs of unrest combined with uncontrolled urban development and significant seasonal variations of exposed population result in highly dynamic volcanic risk. For the sake of illustration of all the steps of the ADVISE model, we focus here on the risk assessment of the transport system in relation to the tephra fallout associated with a long-lasting Vulcanian cycle.

Highlights

  • Developing methodologies to assess risk associated with natural hazards is an on-going challenge globally due to the complexity of assessing and combining the various risk factors (e.g. Wisner et al 2003)

  • Risk assessment in the integrAteD VolcanIc risk asSEssment (ADVISE) model is a function of four aspects, the combination of which can be qualitative, semi-quantitative or quantitative depending on the availability of data and the approach adopted (Fig. 1)

  • About two-thirds (67%) of the residents live in the areas of Porto Levante and Vulcanello in the north end of the island, 30% lives in Piano located in the South of the island, and 3% is distributed in two small area: Lentia, a residential subdivision on the west central side of the island, and Gelso, a more remote and scattered community in the far south of the island (Comune di Lipari 2017 personal communication)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Developing methodologies to assess risk associated with natural hazards is an on-going challenge globally due to the complexity of assessing and combining the various risk factors (e.g. hazard, exposure, vulnerability, resilience) (e.g. Wisner et al 2003). Developing methodologies to assess risk associated with natural hazards is an on-going challenge globally due to the complexity of assessing and combining the various risk factors (e.g. hazard, exposure, vulnerability, resilience) (2021) 10:7 and risk mitigation for eruptions remains limited. The term risk refers to the expected loss as a function of hazard, exposure and vulnerability (e.g. UNDRO 1979; Fournier d’Albe 1979). While strategies to assess hazard and exposure have reached an acceptable level of consensus in the scientific community, the concepts of vulnerability and resilience remain a complex and hotly debated topic in disaster research (e.g. Coburn et al 1991; Wisner et al 2003; Cannon 2008; Norris et al 2008; Li et al 2010; Cutter 2013; Tiernan et al 2019)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call