Abstract

Despite ecosystem services having been broadly studied in the scientific literature, they are still hardly integrated in policy-making and landscape management. The lack of operative tools for their application is a main limiting factor of such operationalization. In this work, a framework including 53 livability services produced by the biophysical and socioeconomic subsystem, or by their interaction, was developed considering a local study area. All the services were characterized in terms of the need to access their Service Benefiting Areas (SBAs, the geographical units where the services benefit consumers) from the Use Regions (URs, the usual location of users). Moreover, the Service-Providing Areas (SPAs, the geographical unit where the service is produced) were also classified and characterized. Such analysis, together with empirical observations, helped to classify the spatial relationships between the SPAs, SBAs and URs of each service. In addition to a list of detailed information about all the services included in the framework, a visual scheme representing the different SBA types and an operational flow diagram synthesizing the spatial organization of service flow were designed to apply the methodology in other study areas. Two examples show the practical applicability in policy-making of the whole framework for supporting different aspects of local decision-making.

Highlights

  • IntroductionLanders [5] stated that “Ecosystem Services (ESs) are components of the natural environment”, many ESs need human input for their delivery

  • Each service in the classification was explicitly characterized by a number of attributes based on the various concepts described in this study

  • The framework includes an improved and more specialized Ecosystem Services (ESs) and US classification (LIAM 2.0) able to support decision-making about livability services more effectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Landers [5] stated that “ESs are components of the natural environment”, many ESs need human input for their delivery. Agricultural products are produced by strongly-managed ecosystems [6], while educational services can be provided by ecosystems themselves or by human activities. Many human needs, such as energy supply, transport, healthcare, food and water servicing, undeniably are typically satisfied by Urban Services (USs [7]) without strictly relying on natural systems (e.g., by providing cinemas, theatres, hospitals, public security)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.