Abstract

BackgroundPatients across North America are using complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) with increasing frequency as part of their management of many different health conditions. The objective of this study was to develop a guide for academic health sciences centers that may wish to consider starting an integrative medicine program.MethodsWe queried North American leaders in the field of integrative medicine to identify initial sites. Key stakeholders at each of the initial sites visited were then asked to identify additional potential study sites (snowball sampling), until no new sites were identified. We conducted structured interviews to identify critical factors associated with success and failure in each of four domains: research, education, clinical care, and administration. During the interviews, field notes were recorded independently by at least two investigators. Team meetings were held after each visit to reach consensus on the information recorded and to ensure that it was as complete as possible. Content analysis techniques were used to identify key themes that emerged from the field notes.ResultsWe identified ten leading North American integrative medical centers, and visited nine during 2002–2003. The centers visited suggested that the initiation of an integrative medicine program requires a significant initial outlay of funding and a motivated "champion". The centers had important information to share regarding credentialing, medico-legal issues and billing for clinical programs; identifying researchers and research projects for a successful research program; and strategies for implementing flexible educational initiatives and establishing a functional administrative structure.ConclusionImportant lessons can be learned from academic integrative programs already in existence. Such initiatives are timely and feasible in a variety of different ways and in a variety of settings.

Highlights

  • Patients across North America are using complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) with increasing frequency as part of their management of many different health conditions

  • There is a lack of information regarding how Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is being integrated into academic medical institutions, if it is being integrated at all [10]

  • Many multidisciplinary medical centers aim to treat the "whole person", with consideration given to emotional, social, and environmental factors that may play a part in illness, most programs do not yet integrate CAM therapies even if they have demonstrated efficacy and cost-effectiveness [11,12]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Patients across North America are using complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) with increasing frequency as part of their management of many different health conditions. A commonly accepted definition of CAM is a "group of diverse medical and health care systems, practices, and products that are not presently considered to be part of conventional medicine [3].". More recent studies suggest CAM use is common among the majority of health care users, and appears to be greater among those with serious, chronic, or recurrent illness [5,8]. Many multidisciplinary medical centers aim to treat the "whole person", with consideration given to emotional, social, and environmental factors that may play a part in illness, most programs do not yet integrate CAM therapies even if they have demonstrated efficacy and cost-effectiveness [11,12]. While there are many definitions of "integration", for our purposes it is defined as a collaborative team approach that includes both conventional "Western" and CAM health care providers

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call