Abstract

We evaluated a rapid bacterial identification (rID) and a rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disk diffusion (rAST) from positive blood culture to overcome the limitations of the conventional methods and reduce the turnaround time in bloodstream infection diagnostics. The study included hemocultures flagged as positive by bacT/ALERT®, identification by MALDI-TOF MS, and rAST. The results were compared to identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results by current standard methods, after 24 h incubation. For rAST categorical agreement (CA), very major errors (VME), major errors (ME), and minor errors (mE) were calculated. A total of 524 bacterial samples isolated from blood cultures were obtained, including 246 Gram-negative (GN) and 278 Gram-positive (GP) aerobes. The overall concordance of rID was 88.6%, and it was highest among GN (96%). A total of 2196 and 1476 antimicrobial agent comparisons were obtained for GN and GP, respectively. Evaluation of rAST, CA, VME, ME, and mE disclosed 97.7, 0.7, 0.5, and 1.1% for GN and 98.0, 0.5, 0.7, and 0.8% for GP, respectively. Meropenem CA, VME, and ME were 98.3, 0.5, and 0.5%, respectively; mE was not observed. Oxacillin CA, ME, and mE were 97.4, 1.6, and 0.6%, respectively; VME was not observed. Overall, kappa scores of the results of the comparisons demonstrated the high agreement between rAST and the standard method. Identification and AST of aerobic bacteria from positive blood cultures after a short period of incubation on solid blood agar is a fast and reliable method that may improve the management of bloodstream infections.

Highlights

  • We evaluated a rapid bacterial identification and a rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disk diffusion from positive blood culture to overcome the limitations of the conventional methods and reduce the turnaround time in bloodstream

  • When we analyzed these categorical discrepancies by antimicrobial agents used for GN, we observed that all antimicrobial agents presented acceptable results, but piperacillin-tazobactam very major errors (VME) was ≥1.5

  • Meropenem categorical agreement (CA), VME, and major errors (ME) were 98.3, 0.5, and 0.5%, respectively, and no minor errors (mE) was observed. When we analyzed these categorical discrepancies by antimicrobial agents used for GP, we observed that all antimicrobial agents presented acceptable limits, but the clarithromycin VME value was 1.8%, and levofloxacin ME value was 3.7%

Read more

Summary

Research Article

Integrating Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing: A Simple and Rapid Approach to Reduce the Turnaround Time in the Management of Blood Cultures. We evaluated a rapid bacterial identification (rID) and a rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disk diffusion (rAST) from positive blood culture to overcome the limitations of the conventional methods and reduce the turnaround time in bloodstream. Even simpler and faster than traditional bacterial identification methods, analysis of blood cultures via MALDI-TOF MS and the detection of antimicrobial resistance require a preliminary bacterial culture in solid media. We evaluated a rapid modified bacterial identification and an early antimicrobial resistance detection from positive blood cultures based on centrifugation and short-time bacterial incubation to reduce the turnaround time in bloodstream infection diagnostics in a routine microbiology laboratory

Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Concordance level n
Kappa score
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call