Abstract

With the anticipated boom in the ‘blue economy’ and associated increases in industrialization across the world’s oceans, new and complex risks are introduced to ocean ecosystems. As a result, conservation and resource management increasingly look to factor in potential interactions among the social, ecological and economic components of these systems. Investigation of these interactions requires interdisciplinary frameworks that incorporate methods and insights from across the social and biophysical sciences. Risk assessment methods, which have been developed across numerous disciplines and applied to various real-world settings and problems, provide a unique connection point for cross-disciplinary engagement. However, research on risk is often conducted in distinct spheres by experts whose focus is on narrow sources or outcomes of risk. Movement towards a more integrated treatment of risk to ensure a balanced approach to developing and managing ocean resources requires cross-disciplinary engagement and understanding. Here, we provide a primer on risk assessment intended to encourage the development and implementation of integrated risk assessment processes in the emerging blue economy. First, we summarize the dominant framework for risk in the ecological / biophysical sciences. Then, we discuss six key insights from the long history of risk research in the social sciences that can inform integrated assessments of risk: 1) consider the subjective nature of risk, 2) understand individual social and cultural influences on risk perceptions, 3) include diverse expertise, 4) consider the social scales of analysis, 5) incorporate quantitative and qualitative approaches, and 6) understand interactions and feedbacks within systems. Finally, we show how these insights can be incorporated into risk assessment and management, and apply them to a case study of whale entanglements in fishing gear off the U.S. west coast.

Highlights

  • Competition for use of the ocean is intensifying

  • Ocean development activities have already resulted in increasing cumulative impacts in the oceans (Halpern et al, 2008), rising threats to valued marine life (Davies and Brillant, 2019), and intensifying risks to the livelihoods of individuals employed in the maritime economy

  • With a push for more transparent, sustainable and equitable decision-making in the oceans (Lubchenco et al, 2016; Golden et al, 2017; Bennett, 2018; Lester et al, 2018) we need to understand the impacts of the blue economy on both the environment and people

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Competition for use of the ocean is intensifying. As governments and private investors look to the sea as the economic frontier (the “blue economy”), the number and variety of ocean uses is climbing and investments in ocean development and infrastructure are rising (European Commission, 2019; Voyer and van Leeuwen, 2019). To ensure a comprehensive set of metrics requires a careful process of context setting in the risk management process and inclusion of a diversity of stakeholders (see insight 3) It follows from the first and second insights and considerable research on participative environmental assessment and decision-making (e.g., NRC, 2008) that achieving an effectively integrated assessment of risk to a social-ecological system requires a diverse team. This includes stakeholders, practitioners and researchers from multiple disciplines. We illustrate how applying the insights described in this paper better addresses the complexities of the problem to achieve a more integrated risk assessment, and provide a post hoc interpretation of why California reached the early closure decision this year (2019)

A Disciplinary Ecological Risk Approach
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call