Abstract

573 Background: Given the lack of biomarkers to predict a pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT) for rectal cancer, selection for non-operative management (NOM) mandates complete clinical response. We have previously developed/validated a model to assess genomic-based tumor radiosensitivity: the radiosensitivity index (RSI), which formulates a clinically actionable model to calculate genomic-adjusted radiation dose (GARD). We determined the profiles of RSI and GARD for rectal cancer and correlated these findings with the pathologic response patterns. Methods: One hundred seventeen rectal cancer patients treated from 2009 to 2018 with NACRT were assessed for the tumor regression grade (TRG) (0 = pCR; 1 = moderate response; 2 = partial response; 3 = poor response). RSI was analyzed in an independent tissue cohort of 113 resected rectal cancer samples. GARD was derived as described before, which shows a high GARD value indicated a superior therapeutic effect of radiation. Results: Median follow-up from completion of NACRT was 26 months. The primary tumor stages were 7% T2, 84% T3, and 9% T4. The majority of patients (82%) received concurrent 5-FU or Capecitabine and (83%) received RT dose of 50.4 Gy (range 45-56 Gy). Median time from end of NACRT to surgery was 61 days (range 36-105 days). The patterns of pathological response were TRG 0 (n = 24; 21%), 1 (n = 62; 53%), 2 (n = 25; 21%), and 3 (n = 6; 5%), suggesting heterogeneous sensitivity to treatment with similar tumor stage and treatment regimens. The median RSI for the tissue cohort was 0.46 (range 0.19-0.81) with 37% of the samples considered radiosensitive based on prior data. GARD values ranged from 5.17 to 41.79 (median 19.24), suggesting heterogeneous RT therapeutic effects. Conclusions: The findings from the clinical cohort were consistent with the tissue cohort showing significant heterogeneity in the individual tumor radiosensitivity and GARD-based RT therapeutic effects. With the development of GARD-based prospective trials, we anticipate more biology-based customized RT dosing which could optimize patient selection for NOM and individualize the most appropriate dose for each patient.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call