Abstract

The pore system in carbonates is complicated because of the associated biological and chemical activity. Secondary porosity, on the other hand, is the result of chemical reactions that occur during diagenetic processes. A thorough understanding of the carbonate pore system is essential to hydrocarbon prospecting. Porosity classification schemes are currently limited to accurately forecast the petrophysical parameters of different reservoirs with various origins and depositional environments. Although rock classification offers a way to describe lithofacies, it has no impact on the application of the poro-perm correlation. An outstanding example of pore complexity (both in terms of type and origin) may be found in the Central Luconia carbonate system (Malaysia), which has been altered by diagenetic processes. Using transmitted light microscopy, 32 high-resolution pictures were collected of each thin segment for quantitative examination. An FESEM picture and a petrographic study of thin sections were used to quantify the grains, matrix, cement, and macroporosity (pore types). Microporosity was determined by subtracting macroporosity from total porosity using a point-counting technique. Moldic porosity (macroporosity) was shown to be the predominant type of porosity in thin sections, whereas microporosity seems to account for 40 to 50% of the overall porosity. Carbonates from the Miocene have been shown to possess a substantial quantity of microporosity, making hydrocarbon estimate and production much more difficult. It might lead to a higher level of uncertainty in the estimation of hydrocarbon reserves if ignored. Existing porosity classifications cannot be used to better understand the poro-perm correlation because of the wide range of geological characteristics. However, by considering pore types and pore structures, which may be separated into macro- and microporosity, the classification can be enhanced. Microporosity identification and classification investigations have become a key problem in limestone reservoirs across the globe.

Highlights

  • Carbonate rocks account for 60% of the world’s oil and gas reserves [1]

  • Most global oil reserves are in carbonate reservoirs [2,3,4]

  • Carbonate reservoirs are found in large conventional oil fields such as Saudi Arabia’s Ghawar [5]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most global oil reserves are in carbonate reservoirs [2,3,4]. Carbonate reservoirs are found in large conventional oil fields such as Saudi Arabia’s Ghawar [5]. Despite their reputation, carbonate reservoirs are no more difficult to predict, interpret, or define than siliciclastic reservoirs [6,7]. Diagenesis, geochemical characteristics, and rock fabric variations influence development costs and ultimate recovery. Despite recent advances in stratigraphic and pore-scale carbonate reservoir characterization [12], numerous challenges remain in understanding and managing the uncertainties caused by heterogeneity. Diagenesis, microporosity prediction, microporosity effect on petrophysical properties, and depositional origins are yet unknown [13,14]. As a result, detecting carbonates is difficult since their characteristics vary within a reservoir

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call