Integrated PET/CT in the preoperative staging of lung cancer: A prospective comparison of CT, PET and integrated PET/CT

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of integrated PET/CT in the staging of lung cancer compared with CT alone or PET alone. Materials and methodsThirty-three patients underwent integrated PET/CT for the staging of lung cancer. The tumor, node and metastasis (TNM) stages were assessed with CT, PET and integrated PET–CT and compared with the surgical and pathological staging. ResultsCT correctly evaluated the (T) status in (64%) of the patients, PET in (59%) and PET/CT in (86%). CT correctly evaluated the (N) status in (73%) of the patients, PET in (76%), and PET/CT (88%) with accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 73%, 78%, 71%, 50% and 94% for CT, 76%, 67%, 79%, 55% and 95% for PET and 88%, 89%, 88%, 73% and 100% for PET/CT respectively, and for (M) status were 91%, 86%, 92%, 75% and 96% for CT, 88%, 71%, 92%, 71% and 92% for PET and 97%, 100%, 96%, 88% and 100% for PET/CT respectively. Regarding the overall TNM staging CT correctly staged 24 patients. PET correctly staged 23 cases while PET/CT correctly staged 30 cases. A significant difference in the accuracy of overall tumor staging between PET/CT and CT (P=0.0412) or PET (P=0.0233). ConclusionThe integrated PET/CT is superior to either CT or PET in the staging of lung cancer which has an important impact on selection of the appropriate treatment regimen.