Abstract

Oilseed rape (OSR) is the second largest source of vegetable oil globally and the most important biofuel feedstock in the European Union (EU) but the production of this important crop is threatened by a small insect, Psylliodes chrysocephala – the cabbage stem flea beetle (CSFB). The EU ban on use of neonicotinoid seed treatments and resistance of CSFB to pyrethroid insecticides have left farmers with limited control options resulting in drastic reductions in production. Integrated pest management (IPM) may offer a solution. We review the lifecycle of CSFB and the current options available, or in the research pipeline, for the eight IPM principles of the EU Sustainable Use of Pesticides Directive (Directive‐2009/128/EC). A full IPM strategy for CSFB barely exists. Although there are a range of preventative measures, these require scientific validation; critically, resistant/tolerant OSR cultivars are not yet available. Existing monitoring methods are time‐consuming and there are no commercial models to enable decision support based on predictions of migration timing or population size. Available thresholds are not based on physiological tolerances of the plant making it hard to adapt them to changing market prices for the crop and costs of control. Non‐synthetic alternatives tested and registered for use against CSFB are lacking, making resistance management impossible. CSFB control is therefore dependent upon conservation biocontrol. Natural enemies of CSFB are present, but quantification of their effects is needed and habitat management strategies to exploit their potential. Although some EU countries have local initiatives to reduce insecticide use and encourage use of ‘greener’ alternatives, there is no formal process for ranking these and little information available to help farmers make choices. We summarize the main knowledge gaps and future research needed to improve measures for CSFB control and to facilitate development of a full IPM strategy for this pest and sustainable oilseeds production.

Highlights

  • Oilseed rape (Brassica napus, L., OSR) is the second largest source of vegetable oil in the world, after soybean (European Commission 2018); grown throughout most of the European continent (Table S1) it is the dominant biodiesel feedstock in the European Union (EU), accounting for 39% of total biodiesel feedstock production (USDA 2019)

  • Oilseed rape (OSR) is the second largest source of vegetable oil globally and the most important biofuel feedstock in the European Union (EU) but production of this important crop is threatened by a small insect; Psylliodes chrysocepaha – the cabbage stem flea beetle (CSFB)

  • We review the lifecycle of CSFB and the current options available, or in the research pipeline, for the eight Integrated pest management (IPM) principles of the EU Sustainable Use of Pesticides Directive (Directive-2009/128/EC)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Oilseed rape (Brassica napus, L., OSR) is the second largest source of vegetable oil in the world, after soybean (European Commission 2018); grown throughout most of the European continent (Table S1) it is the dominant biodiesel feedstock in the European Union (EU), accounting for 39% of total biodiesel feedstock production (USDA 2019). In a recent study on the impact of simulated shot-holing injury and controlled CSFB larval infestation, it was shown that OSR can compensate for leaf area injury of up to 90% at the cotyledon stage significant reductions in plant height, yield and quality occurred when artificially infested with more than 5 CSFB larvae/plant (Coston 2021). Decision support systems (DSS) The influence of weather factors on population dynamics of OSR pests, including CSFB, were studied in Germany; phenological models were developed and incorporated into a computer-based DSS ‘proPlant’ (Johnen et al 2000) This DSS allows the use of field observations (pest pressure, crop growth stage, growing conditions), combined with predicted local weather data to predict potential pest infestation, control requirements and optimal treatment dates (Johnen et al 2010). Evaluation strategies based on multicriteria analysis (Caffi et al 2017) or long-term studies using randomized controlled trials could be explored (Rejesus and Jones 2020)

Conclusions
Monitoring
Decisionmaking
Synthetic Insecticides Insecticide selection
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call