Abstract

The main aim of this study was to compare a number of recently proposed Bayesian and frequentist statistical methods for the estimation of genetic parameters and to apply the cross-validation (CV) approach in order to tune the variance components in simulated and field plant breeding datasets. We were especially interested in whether the CV approach was capable of improving the prediction accuracy of breeding values which have been obtained using the residual (or restricted/reduced) maximum likelihood and Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation tools. We showed that the nonsampling-based Bayesian inference method of integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA) can be used for rapid and accurate estimation of genetic parameters in linear mixed models with multiple random effects such as additive, dominance, and genotype-by-environment interaction effects. Moreover, we also compared the INLA estimates with results obtained using Markov chain Monte Carlo and restricted maximum likelihood methods. In other studies, K-fold CV is primarily used for comparing method performance; however, here we showed that the K-fold CV method can be used to tune genetic parameters and minimize the prediction error in the estimation of breeding value . We also compared the K-fold CV results with different generalized cross-validation methods which are much faster to compute. Analysis results obtained from field and simulated datasets are presented.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call