Abstract

Flood risk assessment is crucial for delineating flood hazard zones and formulating effective mitigation strategies. Employing a multi-criteria decision support system, this study focused on assessing a Flood Risk Index (FHI) at the Dades Wadi watershed scale. Seven main flood-causing criteria were broadly selected, namely flow accumulation, distance from hydrographic network, drainage network density, land use, slope, rainfall, and permeability. The relative importance of each criterion prioritized as per their contribution toward flood risk, which were employed a blend of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Geographic Information System (GIS)/Remote Sensing (RS) techniques. The significance of each criterion was determined based on their contribution to flood hazard, and their relative importance was established through an AHP pair-wise comparison matrix. The efficacy of the AHP model was performed with a consistency ratio of 0.08, which indicated that each flood criterion weight is confirmed. Among the flood-causing criteria, the hydrologic flow accumulation factor was identified as the most influential (weight: 3.11), while permeability exhibited the least prominence (weight: 0.58). Approximately 40.36% of the total area, equivalent to around 1319, 89 km2, was concentrated within very high flood-risk zones situated near rivers. In contrast, an area of approximately 399,943 km2 (56.33%) exhibited a low to very low flood risk zone. The validation of the FHI map encompassed the application of the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC) technique, revealing an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 85%.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call