Abstract

The integrated use of hydraulic flushing and electrokinetic treatment was investigated for the remediation of silty sand contaminated by both PAHs and heavy metals. The soil was collected from a polluted former manufactured gas plant (MGP). Four bench-scale experiments were conducted to analyze the ability of the combined hydraulic flushing and the electrokinetic treatment for the simultaneous removal of PAHs and heavy metals. Sequential flushing with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or Igepal CA-720 were tested with or without the simultaneous application of a low intensity direct electric field (1 VDC cm−1). The best results were obtained with 0.2 M EDTA flushing in two stages (without and with voltage gradient, 1 VDC cm−1), followed by 5% Igepal flushing in two stages (without and with 1 VDC cm−1). Heavy metals were removed mainly during the EDTA flushing, with removal efficiencies of about 60% for Zn, 80% for Pb, and 30% for Cu. During Igepal flushing, no heavy metals were removed, but PAHs were removed, including 40% phenanthrene, 30% pyrene, and 20% benzo[a]pyrene. Overall, this study showed that a carefully designed sequential hydraulic flushing scheme with selected chelant and surfactant is needed for the removal of both heavy metals and PAHs from MGP silty sands. Combining electrokinetics with hydraulic flushing may not necessarily improve contaminant removal from such soils.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call