Abstract

To determine whether amblyopia interferes with cognitive functions requiring visuospatial processing, measured by the Tower of London (ToL) test. The current study was based on a sub-cohort from the population-based Gutenberg Health Study and included 1,569 participants aged 35 to 44 years. Amblyopia was defined as a visual acuity of 0.63 or worse (worse eye) in the presence of an amblyogenic factor; prevalence was 5%. There were three groups: participants with amblyopia (n = 78), participants with a visual acuity of 0.63 or worse (worse eye) without amblyopia (n = 65), and participants with a visual acuity of better than 0.63 (worse eye) (n = 1,426). Visuospatial planning ability was measured by the ToL test (touch-screen version), and the performance score ranged from 0 to 24, depending on the number of correctly solved problems. The authors used linear regression models to investigate the association between amblyopia and ToL test scores, adjusting for age, sex, and socioeconomic status. The mean ± standard deviation of ToL test performance was 15.31 ± 3.29 in participants with a visual acuity of better than 0.63, 14.56 ± 3.76 in the amblyopic group, and 15.14 ± 3.65 in participants with a visual acuity of 0.63 or worse without amblyopia. In a linear regression model, sex, and socioeconomic status significantly predicted planning performance (P <.0001), whereas amblyopic status did not (P = .20). Amblyopia may affect visuospatial perception, but no such relationships could be found for higher cognitive functions that strongly depend on visuospatial processing. Thus, in adulthood, individuals with amblyopia are unaffected in their visuospatial cognitive abilities, as required by the ToL test. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2019;56(6):397-401.].

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call