Abstract
This article focuses on two cornerstone results in insurance economics: Mossin's Theorem on the optimality of full versus partial coverage, and Arrow's Theorem on the optimality of straight deductible policies. Both of these results are examined in a model assuming only risk aversion, and not necessarily expected-utility maximization. The results also are examined with the inclusion of a noninsurable background risk. Arrow's result is robust enough to hold in all of these situations. Mossin's result is shown to hold with a slight weakening, to account for possible nonsmoothness of preferences in non-expected-utility models.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
