Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that the presence of at least one u-haplotype of the rat major histocompatibility complex (MHC), RT1, is a necessary but not sufficient condition for the development of overt diabetes mellitus. The present studies were undertaken to determine which portion of the RT1 gene complex is necessary for the occurrence of diabetes. We crossed hooded diabetic rats (RT1.AuBuDu) with PVGr8 rats (RT1.AaBuDu). F1 animals were mated to give 82 F2 animals and backcrossed with the hooded diabetics to produce 41 backcross animals. Diabetes occurred in animals with all three possible RT1.A genotypes. The diabetes was similar to that seen in BB rats and in hybrid strains developed from them. An immunoregulatory defect was marked by decreased percentage of peripheral blood lymphocytes staining with w3/25 monoclonal antibody, by an increased percentage of peripheral blood lymphocytes binding a mouse ascites control protein, and by decreased responsiveness of peripheral blood lymphocytes to stimulation by concanavalin A. We conclude that the u-allele of the class I A-locus gene product is not necessary for susceptibility to the development of diabetes in the rat. Therefore, either genes coding for the class II products of the u-haplotype or genes in linkage disequilibrium with these genes and mapping to the right of the A locus provide the permissive condition. Furthermore, the data suggest, but do not prove, that the u-haplotype derived from a strain remote from the BB rat can confer this susceptibility to the development of diabetes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.