Abstract

BackgroundInsulin is essential for glycemic regulation but diseases can cause a default or an excess of insulin secretion leading to dysregulated glycemia. Hence, measurement of insulinemia is useful to investigate hypoglycemia, determine the pathogenesis of diabetes and evaluate β-cell function. Thus, diabetic patients need supplementation with recombinant human insulin and/or insulin analogues. Analogues have primary sequences different from native human insulin and may not be detected by some immunoassays. The objective of our study was to evaluate new insulin immunoassays by determining their ability to detect different types of human insulin or analogues. MethodsThis study compared the reactivity of two new insulin immunoassays with five well-established immunoassays on ten commercial insulins. We also measured insulin in blood samples from diabetic or pancreas transplant patients with known treatment. ResultsContrary to recombinant human insulin, there were differences in the specificity to insulin analogues. We distinguished three immunoassay categories: those recognizing all types of insulin such as the non-specific BI-INS-IRMA®, Architect® and Access® immunoassays; those recognizing human insulin only (Cobas®); and those recognizing human insulin and analogues in variable proportions (Liaison XL®, iFlash® and Maglumi®). ConclusionAn accurate biological interpretation of insulinemia relies on knowledge of the specificity of the immunoassay used.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call