Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic potential of contrast-enhanced transcranial color-coded sonography (CE-TCCS) and contrast-enhanced transcranial power-based sonography (CE-TPS) in patients with insufficient or absent acoustic bone windows (IABW). Due to temporal bone thickness, the basal cerebral circulation could not be insonated in 21 of 172 patients using unenhanced transcranial color-coded real-time sonography (TCCS) and transcranial power-based sonography. Additional CE-TCCS and CE-TPS were performed after application of 400 mg/ml galactose microbubble suspension. In both modalities, the use of echo-contrast agents allowed visualisation of the first segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) in all patients. The A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery (67% in CE-TCCS; 81% in CE-TPS), P1 segment of the posterior cerebral artery (71% in CE-TCCS; 76% in CE-TPS) and the basilar artery (48% in CE-TCCS; 67% in CE-TPS) were depictable in the majority of the examinations. The M3 (5% in CE-TCCS; 33% in CE-TPS; p < 0.05), P2 (24% in CE-TCCS; 71% in CE-TPS; p < 0.005), P3 segments (0% in CE-TCCS; 43% in CE-TPS; p < 0.005) and the posterior communicating artery (5% in CE-TCCS; 33% in CE-TPS; p < 0.05) were detected in a significantly greater proportion of subjects using power Doppler. In conclusion, CE-TCCS and CE-TPS appear to be sensitive ultrasonic tools that provide reliable data regarding the basal cerebral circulation in patients with IABW. Furthermore, CE-TPS offers advantages over CE-TSSC in the identification of small-caliber arteries and vessels that run at unfavorable angels to the ultrasound beam. Both methods can overcome hyperostosis of the skull that is a major hindrance in transcranial ultrasonography, and may be helpful in the diagnosis of occlusive diseases of intracranial vessels.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call