INSTRUMENTATION INACCURACIES STRONGLY INFLUENCE THE BIOMECHANICAL AND COMPUTATIONAL FAILURE RISK OF FRACTURE FIXATIONS

Abstract

Despite past advances of implant technologies, complication rates of fixations remain high at challenging sites such as the proximal humerus [1]. These may not only be owed to the implant itself but also to dissatisfactory surgical execution of fracture reduction and implant positioning. Therefore, the aim of this study was to quantify the instrumentation accuracy of a highly standardised and guided procedure and its influence on the biomechanical outcome and predicted failure risk.Preoperative planning of osteotomies creating an unstable 3-part fracture and fixation with a locking plate was performed based on CT scans of eight pairs of low-density proximal humerus samples from elderly female donors (85.2±5.4 years). 3D-printed subject-specific guides were used to osteotomise and instrument the samples according to the pre-OP plan. Instrumentation accuracies in terms of screw lengths and orientations were evaluated by comparing post-OP CT scans with the pre-OP plan. The fixation constructs were biomechanically tested until cyclic cut-out failure [2]. Failure risks of the planned and the post-OP configurations were predicted using a validated sample-specific finite element (FE) simulation approach [2] and correlated with the experimental outcomes.Small deviations were found for the instrumented screw trajectories compared to the planned configuration in the proximal-distal (0.3±1.3º) and anterior-posterior directions (-1.7±1.8º), and for screw tip to joint distances (-0.3±1.1 mm). Significantly higher failure risk was predicted for the post-OP compared to the planned configurations (p<0.01) via FE. When incorporating the instrumentation inaccuracies, the biomechanical results could be predicted well with FE (R2=0.70).Despite the high instrumentation accuracy achieved using sophisticated subject-specific 3D-printed guides, even minor deviations from the pre-OP plan significantly increased the FE-predicted risk of failure. This underlines the importance of intraoperative guiding technology [3] in tandem with careful pre-OP planning to assist surgeons to achieve optimal outcomes.AcknowledgementsThis study was performed with the assistance of the AO Foundation via the AOTRAUMA Network.