Abstract
We used the data of 133 countries to explore the determinants of export diversity among candidate variables that are clearly exogenous or endogenous but with a well-established instrument. These candidates include geography, resource abundance, and institutional quality. Our results suggest that institutional quality is important in determining export diversity, and a country with better institutions has a more diversified export structure. Once institutional quality is controlled for and instrumented with European settler mortality, variables such as geography and resource abundance, which significantly determine export diversity in the baseline regression, are no longer significant. The results are still robust even using alternative measures of institutional quality. They also indicate that the mechanism whereby institutions largely determine export diversity has been presented under the guise of natural resource abundance and geography. Therefore, to some extent, the “natural resource curse” is not a curse, but simply two sides of the same coin.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
