Abstract

The case study explores the role of institutions, their effectiveness, and their legitimacy in developing sustainable production practices over time. Set against the backdrop of government reforms in Malaysia’s emerging SPV industry, developing these practices requires a combination of particular macro-institutional conditions and policies. Although the new policies provide wide-ranging opportunities for many businesses, they also impose constraints on how businesses conduct sustainable production practices. Institutional theory points to the role of several factors in legitimising these practices, such as reducing uncertainty and information costs, pathways to transfer solar technology and knowledge, and providing better financial support. Institutional theory also calls into question how a wide array of actors at the macro-institutional level are able to conduct sustainable production practices. This question has two implications for those within the network: 1. How does sustainable production emerge over time and, by extension, what are: (a) the roles of the network actors; and (b) the actors’ effectiveness in driving business sustainability? 2. How do actors’ relational dynamics legitimise or delegitimise sustainable production practices? The case study explores these and other questions by tracing four key sustainable production practice indicators from the perspective of both institutional and network theory.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.