Abstract
AbstractThis article addresses a significant gap in the literature on legitimacy in global governance, exploring whether, in what ways, and to what extent institutional qualities of international organisations (IOs) matter for popular legitimacy beliefs towards these bodies. The study assesses the causal significance of procedure and performance as sources of legitimacy, unpacks these dimensions into specific institutional qualities, and offers a comparative analysis across IOs in three issue areas of global governance. Theoretically, the article disaggregates institutional sources of legitimacy to consider democratic, technocratic, and fair qualities of procedure and performance. Empirically, it examines the effects of these institutional qualities through a population-based survey experiment in four countries in different world regions with respect to IOs in economic, security, and climate governance. The findings demonstrate that both procedure- and performance-related aspects of IO policymaking matter for popular legitimacy beliefs. This result holds across democratic, technocratic, and fair qualities of IO procedure and performance. Disaggregating the results by issue area indicates that a broader scope of institutional qualities are important for legitimacy beliefs in economic governance compared to security governance and, especially, climate governance. These findings suggest that propositions to reduce the institutional sources of IO legitimacy to single specific qualities would be misguided.
Highlights
Recent history has seen international organisations (IOs) acquire substantially enlarged authority, on the premise that increased transnational policy challenges require expanded regional and global governance.1 whether these higher expectations of IOs translate into actual greater problem-solving depends in part on whether these organisations enjoy popular legitimacy
Disaggregating the results by issue area indicates that a broader scope of institutional qualities are important for legitimacy beliefs in economic governance compared to security governance and, especially, climate governance
Motivated by the premise that popular legitimacy is important for the effective functioning of IOs, this article has explored the sources of legitimacy beliefs with a particular focus on institutional qualities
Summary
Recent history has seen international organisations (IOs) acquire substantially enlarged authority, on the premise that increased transnational policy challenges require expanded regional and global governance. whether these higher expectations of IOs translate into actual greater problem-solving depends in part on whether these organisations enjoy popular legitimacy. Recent history has seen international organisations (IOs) acquire substantially enlarged authority, on the premise that increased transnational policy challenges require expanded regional and global governance.. Recent history has seen international organisations (IOs) acquire substantially enlarged authority, on the premise that increased transnational policy challenges require expanded regional and global governance.1 Whether these higher expectations of IOs translate into actual greater problem-solving depends in part on whether these organisations enjoy popular legitimacy. The importance of popular legitimacy for IOs requires better understanding of its sources, that is, the conditions under which people view IOs as legitimate. We scrutinise this proposition, asking whether, in what ways, and to what extent the institutional qualities of IOs shape citizens’ legitimacy beliefs towards these bodies
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
