Abstract
Given their simplicity and presumed commodity-like nature, institutional S&P 500 Index mutual funds should be subject to active price competition, resulting in only nominal size-adjusted differences in expenses. We find a wide disparity among fund expense ratios and their corresponding characteristics and performance. Overall, the evidence suggests some price competition among institutional S&P 500 Index funds, but not to the extent that they may be considered financial commodities. One explanation for the existence of high-priced index funds is that they tend to require significantly lower minimum initial purchases. Our data do not support the notion that institutional investors buy high-priced S&P 500 Index funds to access broader or lower-cost investment services from fund families. We conclude the market for institutional S&P 500 Index funds is not completely homogenous.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
