Abstract
Although a common template may be apparent across university research management systems, there are differences in the way in which institutions apply, interpret and implement their policy intentions. The way that an individual university’s processes, plans and people implement their research agenda affect the attitudes and morale of artistic researchers and the nature of artistic research. For most artistic researchers, their personal institutional experience tells them how artistic research fits within the higher education system as they presume that all institutions operate in the same way. The examples presented in this chapter show that this is not the case. While many challenges are shared, individual institutional responses can create different perspectives of how artistic research fits within Australian higher education and offer examples for better inclusion.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
