Abstract

Using a sample of firms that privately placed convertible debt with a few institutional buyers during the period 1980 to 1998, we find significantly negative stock and operating performance subsequent to the placements. Yet, our examination of the activities between the placing firm and buyers shows that most institutional buyers remain passive investors after convertible debt placements. Our findings support the “windows of opportunity” hypothesis which suggests that firms issue equity or equity-linked securities when their equity is overpriced. Our findings are not consistent with traditional arguments that private financing arrangements with a limited number of institutional investors allow a firm to avoid the information disparity problems that attend capital-raising endeavors by undervalued or correctly priced firms. Nor are our findings consistent with institutional blockholders formed in a private placement performing a quality certification of the firm or aligning the interest of corporate managers more closely with those of shareholders.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.