Abstract
This paper provides a critique of economic freedom indices through a case study of Singapore's unique political economy. We argue that these metrics reflect an ahistorical approach to development, obscuring real-world institutional diversity. By instantiating a single ideal of laissez-faire and proceeding to measure the magnitude of economic freedom in nations, these indices implicitly treat capitalist varieties as mere defects of laissez-faire rather than as distinct alternatives.Consequently, owing to the discursive power neoliberal metrics enjoy in country-benchmarking, the varied roles that states play are overlooked in development discourse. Singapore's unique political economy and approach to development is one such institutional innovation being neglected. Through its strategic and calibrated control over factor markets, the Singapore state is ranked as a small government by economic freedom indices while simultaneously enjoying significant influence over economic activity. The wider implication is that nations’ unique historical constraints push them onto diverse development trajectories.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
