Abstract

Regarding the basics of ear structure-function relationships in fish, the actual motion of the solid otolith relative to the underlying sensory epithelium has rarely been investigated. Otolith motion has been characterized based on a few experimental studies and on approaches using mathematical modeling, which have yielded partially conflicting results. Those studies either predicted a simple back-and-forth motion of the otolith or a shape-dependent, more complex motion. Our study was designed to develop and test a new set-up to generate experimental data on fish otolith motion in-situ. Investigating the basic parameters of otolith motion requires an approach with high spatial and temporal resolution. We therefore used hard X-ray phase contrast imaging (XPCI). We compared two anatomically well-studied cichlid species, Steatocranus tinanti and Etroplus maculatus, which, among other features, differ in the 3D shape of their otoliths. In a water-filled tank, we presented a pure tone of 200 Hz to 1) isolated otoliths embedded in agarose serving as a simple model or 2) to a fish (otoliths in-situ). Our new set-up successfully visualized the motion of otoliths in-situ and therefore paves the way for future studies evaluating the principles of otolith motion.

Highlights

  • In teleost fish, otoliths are solid calcium carbonate biominerals overlying the respective sensory epithelium in the inner ear[1]

  • Otoliths vary greatly in mass and shape among teleost species[2,8]. This raises the question of how these characters affect the relative motion between otolith and sensory epithelium and the stimulation of sensory hair cells[9,10]

  • The otolith–sensory epithelium system acts as an accelerometer because particle acceleration is the relevant stimulus for the otolith organs in the fish ear[6,17]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Otoliths are solid calcium carbonate biominerals overlying the respective sensory epithelium in the inner ear[1]. Otoliths, especially those of the saccule, show a species-specific shape[2] and are about three times denser If the fish moves in a sound field, the denser otolith lags behind relative to the movement of the sensory epithelium[1]. First experimental studies[18] indicated a simple forward and backward motion between the otolith and sensory epithelium. This was adopted for initial mathematical modelling[19,20]. Recent studies on the biting and chewing mouthparts of living cockroach Periplaneta americana[27] or flying blowfly[28] using synchrotron radiation imaging techniques stimulated our idea that movement of otoliths provoked by a sound stimulus could be visualized in-situ as well

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.