In-situ tests of sound-bubble-strobe light barrier technologies to prevent range expansions of Asian carp

Blake Ruebush,Greg Sass,Joshua Stafford,John Chick

doi:10.3391/ai.2012.7.1.005

Blake Ruebush, Greg Sass + Show 2 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2012.7.1.005

Copy DOI

Abstract

Bighead (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis [Richardson, 1845]) and silver (H. molitrix [Valenciennes, 1844]) carps (collectively, Asian carp) have invaded the Mississippi River Basin and successfully established populations in the Illinois River, where they have negatively influenced native fishes and now pose an imminent threat to invading Lake Michigan through the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal. Sound-bubble-strobe light barrier (SBSLB) technologies may have the potential to slow Asian carp range expansions; for example, a sound-bubble barrier was 95% effective at deterring bighead carp passage in a hatchery raceway experiment. In 20092010, we tested the effectiveness of a SBSLB at repelling Asian and non-Asian carp species (all other fishes tested) within Quiver Creek, a tributary to the Illinois River. To test barrier effectiveness, Asian carp and non-Asian carp species were removed from upstream of the barrier, marked, and released downstream of the SBSLB. Asian carp were also collected from the mainstem Illinois River and transplanted downstream of the barrier. Trials were conducted with the SBSLB ON and OFF to determine upstream passage rates. Short-term and extended trials were also conducted to test for differences in upstream passage rates using sound, bubbles, and strobe lights (flashing and not flashing) versus sound and bubbles only. Barrier effectiveness was evaluated by upstream recaptures. Two of 575 marked silver carp and 85 of 2,937 marked individuals of other fish species breached the barrier and were recaptured. No marked bighead carp (n=101) made upstream passage. Our results suggest that SBSLB technologies could be used as a deterrent system to repel Asian carp, but should not be used as an absolute barrier to prevent range expansions. Potential negative influences of this technology on non-target fishes must also be evaluated prior to implementation as a management tool.

Highlights

Biodiversity loss may be caused by habitat degradation and the influence of invasive species (Didham et al 2007)
Because a single bighead carp was physically collected upstream of the Aquatic Nuisance Species Dispersal Barrier (ANSDB) in the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal (CSSC), and because the Asian carp population in the Illinois River is increasing, these invasive species pose an imminent threat to the Great Lakes
Site selection was based on three factors: 1) the portion of Quiver Creek above the Sound-bubble-strobe light barrier (SBSLB) was blocked by an upstream low head dam that acted as a barrier to prevent upstream fish movements; 2) Asian carp were present in Quiver Creek and abundant in the La Grange Reach, Illinois River; and 3) the FBS provided a power source and housing for electrical components and equipment

Summary

Introduction

Biodiversity loss may be caused by habitat degradation and the influence of invasive species (Didham et al 2007). Because a single bighead carp was physically collected upstream of the Aquatic Nuisance Species Dispersal Barrier (ANSDB) in the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal (CSSC), and because the Asian carp population in the Illinois River is increasing, these invasive species pose an imminent threat to the Great Lakes. Asian carp environmental DNA (eDNA) has been detected in water samples collected upstream of the ANSDB (Jerde et al 2011). Environmental DNA detects the presence or absence of organisms without capturing an actual specimen (Ficetola et al 2008), and is acute at detecting Asian carp when they are at low abundances (Jerde et al 2011).

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion