Abstract

Steel tubular members are widely used as primary and secondary structural framing members in offshore oil and gas platforms. A platform is inherently liable to collisions from ships which can create severe structural damages in the rig. The effect of this damage has been studied by a number of researchers through investigating the impact behaviour isolated tubular members. This is while, the in-situ response of a member located in a structural frame, to lateral impact loads, is not necessarily the same as the response of an individual isolated impacted member. In this paper the behaviour of a chord member forming part of a tubular frame, subjected to impact loads, has been investigated. The tubular frame was tested experimentally by other researchers and reported in the literature. The non-linear numerical models of the frame presented by the authors have been validated against the experimental results. These validated models have been examined under both quasi-static and dynamic impact loads with operational pre-loading applied. It has been found that, in a pre-loaded frame, quasi-static impact loading results in the failure of the impacted member. Interestingly, dynamic modelling of the impact results in the dynamic instability of an adjacent bracing member. It has been noticed that, under a dynamic impact, the impacted in-situ member (located in the frame) behaves rather similarly to a pin ended isolated member. With a quasi-static impact, the impacted in-situ member follows fairly closely the response obtained for a fixed ended isolated member.

Highlights

  • Design of offshore structure components against a ship collision is generally based on available knowledge of the behaviour of damaged and impacted isolated tubular members

  • The differences between the response of a tubular member which is part of a structural frame and an isolated member, when both are subjected to similar impact loads, are caused by several parameters

  • The main objective of the current study is to investigate the difference between the response of an impacted member which is part of a structural frame and the response of a similar isolated member

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Design of offshore structure components against a ship collision is generally based on available knowledge of the behaviour of damaged and impacted isolated tubular members. The boundary conditions of an impacted in-situ member are a function of the connection properties and the stiffness of other members meeting at the connection This type of semi-rigid boundary condition is different from the typical rigid or free end conditions considered in the literature for the study of isolated tubular members (Yao et al.[19]; Frieze and Cho[6]; Amdahl and Eberg[3]; Rambech and Dahl[12]; and Ricles and Bruin[13]). The main objective of the current study is to investigate the difference between the response of an impacted member which is part of a structural frame (an in-situ member) and the response of a similar isolated member. Such a study can link knowledge available in the. Loads literature on the behaviour of impacted and damaged isolated tubular members to in-situ response which is closer to real behaviour

Test Programme
Numerical Models of the Bench Mark Frame
Validation of Numerical Models
Models of the Isolated Impacted Tubular Members
Hinge Unit
RESPONSE TO DYNAMIC IMPACT LOADS
Stable Responses
Isolated member with local effects
Unstable Responses
Failure Loads and Displacements
Static displacement
Circumferential and Longitudinal Deformations
Failure Modes
Findings
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call