Abstract
In this study, we explore different filter and contextual characteristics that influence effectiveness of high-efficiency filters in 21 residences in Toronto, Canada. The in situ effectiveness was assessed with decay tests at the beginning andthe end of filter life with four different filters (MERV 8-14 from ASHRAE Standard 52.2) installed in operational HVAC systems, compared with either the system off or with no filter installed. There was considerable difference between median PM2.5 effectiveness of the non-electret filters when compared to electret filters (16% vs. 36%) of the same nominal efficiency (MERV 8). However, median PM2.5 effectiveness of electret filters only slightly improved (between 5% and 9% absolute increase) as MERV increased from 8 to 14. There was more variation in filter effectiveness between the same filter in different homes than there was between different filters in the same home. Variations in filter performance arose because home-specific particle loss rates (eg, ventilation rate) vary greatly in different buildings. The higher the loss rates due to non-filter factors, the lower the effectiveness of a filter. Given the relatively large variation in effectiveness for a given filter over time and in different homes, increasing system runtime may be a productive way to improve filter performance in many homes.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
