Insights of private general practitioners in group practice on the introduction of National Health Insurance in South Africa.

Shabir Moosa,John Luiz,Teresa Carmichael,Wim Peersman,Anselme Derese

doi:10.4102/phcfm.v8i1.1025

Abstract

BackgroundThe South African government intends to contract with ‘accredited provider groups’ for capitated primary care under National Health Insurance (NHI). South African solo general practitioners (GPs) are unhappy with group practice. There is no clarity on the views of GPs in group practice on contracting to the NHI.ObjectivesTo describe the demographic and practice profile of GPs in group practice in South Africa, and evaluate their views on NHI, compared to solo GPs.MethodsThis was a descriptive survey. The population of 8721 private GPs in South Africa with emails available were emailed an online questionnaire. Descriptive statistical analyses and thematic content analysis were conducted.ResultsIn all, 819 GPs responded (568 solo GPs and 251 GPs in groups). The results are focused on group GPs. GPs in groups have a different demographic practice profile compared to solo GPs. GPs in groups expected R4.86 million ($0.41 million) for a hypothetical NHI proposal of comprehensive primary healthcare (excluding medicines and investigations) to a practice population of 10 000 people. GPs planned a clinical team of 8 to 12 (including nurses) and 4 to 6 administrative staff. GPs in group practices saw three major risks: patient, organisational and government, with three related risk management strategies.ConclusionsGPs can competitively contract with NHI, although there are concerns. NHI contracting should not be limited to groups. All GPs embraced strong teamwork, including using nurses more effectively. This aligns well with the emergence of family medicine in Africa.

Highlights

The South African government intends to contract with ‘accredited provider groups’ for capitated primary care under National Health Insurance (NHI)
Private general practitioners (GPs) do provide some services to the public service, with sessions, or offer free immunisation, family planning and HIV counselling and testing in their rooms with free materials provided by the public service, and an informal arrangement that only services are charged for and not materials
We examined solo GPs in South Africa (SA) in an earlier paper based on this proposal.[8]

Summary

Introduction

The South African government intends to contract with ‘accredited provider groups’ for capitated primary care under National Health Insurance (NHI). South African solo general practitioners (GPs) are unhappy with group practice. Key stakeholders in SA see family physicians as critical to the district health services (DHS), with a growing focus on team-based family practices and community-oriented primary care.[4] Private general practitioners (GPs) do provide some services to the public service, with sessions (where they work in clinics and are paid per hour), or offer free immunisation, family planning and HIV counselling and testing in their rooms with free materials provided by the public service, and an informal arrangement that only services are charged for and not materials

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion