Insights into the tectonostratigraphic setting of the Southern Appalachians during the Blountian tectophase from an integrated geochemical analysis of magmatic phenocrysts in the Ordovician Deicke K-bentonite

Abstract

We evaluate competing hypotheses regarding tectonic models of the early Taconic Orogeny in the Southern Appalachians during the Blountian tectophase with new geochemical data obtained from analyses of apatite and zircon phenocrysts, and melt and mineral inclusions therein, from the Ordovician Deicke K-bentonite (453.35 ± 0.10 Ma). Apatite geochemistry confirms that samples from different locations represent the same eruptive event, and zircon geochemistry and UPb geochronology (including several Grenville-age inherited detrital cores) confirm an evolved magma of continental-arc composition, with the trace-metal geochemistry of magmatic Taconic-age rims on Deicke zircons pointing to a provenance of continental crustal igneous rock melts, specifically a granitic melt with a high level of differentiation, rather than a melt that was mantle-derived, or strongly mantle-influenced. Melt inclusions within Deicke phenocrysts are dacitic (apatite) to rhyolitic (zircon), differences that imply an evolving Deicke magma during its eruption.Our data 1) indicate multiple crustal events, and 2) are tectono-chemical evidence supporting an arc-trench subduction system where subducting preexisting sedimentary rocks were subsequently incorporated into the melt during or prior to collision. Indonesia provides modern analogs: the Banda Arc system, where Australian continental crust is jamming the subduction zone in association with the development of a foreland basin and a sedimentary wedge; the New Guinea – western Melanesian region, with its orogenic highlands and associated foredeep; and the Sumatra –Toba system, where subduction-related explosive volcanism has generated enormous caldera-forming eruptions above continental crust basement. Thus, a model for closure of the Iapetus Ocean involving subduction of older passive margin sediments as part of an island-arc collision with the Laurentian passive margin is acceptable, but models based on a back-arc basin are not compatible with our data.