Abstract

Traditional beekeeping has been playing important socio-economic roles in Ethiopia for millennia. The country is situated in northeast Africa, where ranges of major evolutionary lineages of Apis mellifera adjoin. However, studies on the classification and distribution of subspecies and lineages of honey bees in the country are partly inconsistent, either proposing multiple subspecies and lineages or a unique A. m. simensis. This study was conducted with the aim of elucidating Ethiopian honey bees in reference to African subspecies and major global lineages using wing geometric morphometrics and COI-COII mitochondrial DNA analyses. For this purpose, 660 worker bees were collected from 66 colonies representing highland, midland, and lowland zones in different locations. Both methods indicated that the samples from this study form a distinct cluster together with A. m. simensis reference. In addition, forewing venation patterns showed that most of the Ethiopian samples are separate from all reference subspecies, except A. m. simensis. Analysis of COI-COII sequences revealed five DraI haplotypes (Y2, Y1, A1, and O5’), of which one was new denoted as Y3. Moreover, centroid size strongly associated with elevation. In conclusion, the results supported that Ethiopian honey bees are distinct both at lineage and subspecies levels; however, there is an indication of lineage O in the north.

Highlights

  • The honey bee Apis mellifera, a world-wide distributed species, is an insect with enormousElectronic supplementary material The online version of this article contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.based on Ethiopian honey bees

  • We explored the diversity of Ethiopian honey bees using wing geometric morphometrics and COI-COII mitochondrial DNA analyses

  • Tigray is a regional state that is located in the northern part of the Federal democratic republic of Ethiopia whereas Wendogenet local area is a small geographic area located in the southern part of the country sharing areas between the regional states of Oromia and South Nations Nationalities and Peoples (SNNP)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

According to Arias and Sheppard (1996), subspecies from Northeastern Africa are more related to Middle Eastern groups of subspecies, forming the lineage O with a partial disagreement with preceding classical morphometric classification (Ruttner 1988). In Northeastern Africa and the Middle East, there are several contact zones between lineages A, O, and Y (Cridland et al 2017), because the lineage A represents African bees (Ruttner 1988; Whitfield et al 2006), Y exists in Ethiopia, and the Middle Eastern lineage O extends up to Egypt, Sudan, and Somalia (Franck et al 2001; El-Niweiri and Moritz 2008). Cridland et al (2017) showed five global lineages and confirmed that lineage Y exists in close proximity with A and O lineages by analyzing A . m . jementica samples from Yemen and Saudi Arabia to represent the Ethiopian lineage Y

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call