Abstract

AbstractDrumlins form at the ice/bed interface through subglacial processes that are not directly observable. The internal stratigraphy of drumlins provides insight into how they developed and associated subglacial processes, but traditional stratigraphic logging techniques are limited to natural exposures and excavations. Using ground-penetrating radar, we imaged the internal stratigraphy of seven drumlins from a recently exposed drumlin field in the forefield of Múlajökull, Iceland. Data were collected with 100 and 200 MHz antennas with maximum resolvable depths of 8 and 4 m, respectively. Longitudinal echograms contained coherent down-ice dipping reflectors over the lengths of the drumlins. Near the drumlin heads (i.e., stoss sides), down-glacier dipping beds lie at high angles to the surface, whereas on the lee sides, the down-glacier dipping beds lie at low angles, or conform, to drumlin surfaces. Transverse echograms exhibited unconformities along the flanks of drumlin heads and conformable bedding across the lee side widths of the drumlins. These observations were ground-truthed with stratigraphic logs from a subset of drumlins and good agreement was found. The stratigraphic patterns support previous conclusions that drumlins at Múlajökull formed on a deformable bed through both depositional and erosional processes which may alternate between its surge and quiescent phases.

Highlights

  • Drumlins are widespread geomorphic features that result from subglacial processes acting at the ice/bed interface

  • Echograms collocated with five lithostratigraphic logs illustrate that the ground-penetrating radar (GPR) profiles detected many of the stratigraphic features apparent in the logs

  • Through GPR echograms the internal stratigraphy of seven drumlins was observed and analyzed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Drumlins are widespread geomorphic features that result from subglacial processes acting at the ice/bed interface. Widespread study of drumlins (see Menzies, 1979, 1984; Clark and others, 2009; Stokes and others, 2011; Stokes and others, 2013a, 2013b for a review) has provided an extensive set of observations and have led to a range of drumlin formation models (Boulton, 1987; Shaw, 2002; Schoof, 2007; Clark, 2010; Fowler, 2010; Hooke and Medford, 2013; Iverson and others, 2017) The insights these models potentially provide about subglacial processes will remain limited until their predictions are corroborated by field observations. Geophysical techniques can be used to extend the direct stratigraphic observations, down to a finite depth, and offer a more continuous picture of the stratigraphic architecture of the drumlins (Spagnolo and others, 2014)

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call