Insights from pharmacists and pharmacy technicians about expedited partner therapy.

Abstract

The study was a cross-sectional, Internet-based survey distributed to members of the Pharmacy Society of Wisconsin. Non-retired pharmacists and pharmacy technicians were eligible. EPT knowledge was dichotomised into 'yes' versus 'no/unknown'. Statistical analyses included the χ2 test and Student's two-sided t-test; using an α of 0.05. Ninety-four questionnaires were analysed: 74 pharmacists, 20 pharmacy technicians. Overall, 73 (78%) knew EPT is legal in Wisconsin, 86% of pharmacists versus 45% of pharmacy technicians, P < 0.01. The mean time from graduation/training was less for participants who knew EPT is legal versus those who did not (12.8 years vs 20.2 years, P < 0.01). Sixty-four (68%) participants worked in an outpatient setting, of which 12 (19%) knew of a formal workplace EPT policy. Thirty-two (40%) of the 81 participants who had heard of EPT thought nameless EPT prescriptions should not be legal, commonly citing patient safety concerns. This study demonstrated inconsistent knowledge of EPT between pharmacists and pharmacy technicians. Knowledge of workplace EPT policies and patient safety concerns were barriers to EPT. Addressing these knowledge and policy barriers will be vital to improve the utilisation of EPT.