Abstract

Several insectivorous bats have included fish in their diet, yet little is known about the processes underlying this trophic shift. We performed three field experiments with wild fishing bats to address how they manage to discern fish from insects and adapt their hunting technique to capture fish. We show that bats react only to targets protruding above the water and discern fish from insects based on prey disappearance patterns. Stationary fish trigger short and shallow dips and a terminal echolocation pattern with an important component of the narrowband and low frequency calls. When the fish disappears during the attack process, bats regulate their attack increasing the number of broadband and high frequency calls in the last phase of the echolocation as well as by lengthening and deepening their dips. These adjustments may allow bats to obtain more valuable sensorial information and to perform dips adjusted to the level of uncertainty on the location of the submerged prey. The observed ultrafast regulation may be essential for enabling fishing to become cost-effective in bats, and demonstrates the ability of bats to rapidly modify and synchronise their sensorial and motor features as a response to last minute stimulus variations.

Highlights

  • The cue to discern prey, the moment the fish submerges— revealing its nature—would be crucial for triggering one or the other hunting technique because of limits to the reaction ability of bats[11]

  • In trawling species, including fishing bats, the terminal phase is divided in two parts: buzz I and buzz II12

  • We described the general differences between insect hunting and fishing, and concluded that the internal components of the terminal phase differ depending on the prey type, using longer buzz I and shorter buzz II when fishing compared to when catching insects[5]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The cue to discern prey, the moment the fish submerges— revealing its nature—would be crucial for triggering one or the other hunting technique because of limits to the reaction ability of bats[11]. The objective of the second experiment was to determine whether bats use prey morphology or the temporality of the produced cue to decide how to attack the target by measuring changes in the dip and echolocation pattern between stationary and submerging fish.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call