Insight into achirality and chirality effects in interactions of an racemic ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complex and its Δ- and Λ-enantiomers with an RNA triplex

Abstract

RNA triplexes have a variety of potential applications in molecular biology, diagnostics and therapeutics, while low stabilization of the third strand hinders their practical utilities under physiological conditions. In this regard, achieving the third-strand stabilization by binding small molecules is a promising strategy. Chirality is one of the basic properties of nature. To clarify achirality and chirality effects on the binding and stabilizing effects of RNA triplexes by small molecules, we report for the first time the RNA interactions of an racemic ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complex [Ru(bpy)2(11-CN-dppz)]2+ (rac-Ru1) and its two enantiomers Δ/Λ-[Ru(bpy)2(11-CN-dppz)]2+ (Δ/Λ-Ru1) with an RNA triplex poly(U-A*U) (where “-” represents Watson-Crick base pairing, and “*” denotes Hoogsteen base pairing, respectively) in this work. Research shows that although rac-Ru1 and its two enantiomers Δ/Λ-Ru1 bind to the RNA triplex through the same mode of intercalation, the binding affinity for enantiomer Δ-Ru1 is much higher than that for rac-Ru1 and enantiomer Λ-Ru1. However, compared to enantiomer Λ-Ru1, the binding affinity for rac-Ru1 does not show much of an advantage, which is slightly greater than that for the former. Thermal denaturation measurements reveal both rac-Ru1 and Δ-Ru1 to have a preference for stabilizing the third strand rather than the template duplex of the RNA triplex, while Λ-Ru1 stabilizes the RNA triplex without significant selectivity. Besides, the third-strand stabilizing effects by rac-Ru1 and Δ-Ru1 are not markedly different from each other, but more marked than that by Λ-Ru1. This work shows that the binding properties of the racemic Ru(II) polypyridyl complex with the RNA triplex are not simply an average of its two enantiomers, indicating potentially complicated binding events.