Inside‐out versus outside‐in transobturator tension‐free vaginal tape: A 5‐year prospective comparative study

Abstract

To compare the 1-year and 5-year outcomes of transobturator tension-free vaginal tape with outside-in and inside-out approaches in women with urinary stress incontinence, and to identify risk factors for treatment failure at 5 years. A prospective observational study was carried out for women with urinary stress incontinence who underwent transobturator tension-free vaginal tape from September 2004 to March 2008 in a tertiary urogynecology center. Women (n = 213) had either an outside-in (n = 124) or inside-out (n = 89) procedure. They were followed up annually until 5 years after the operation. Subjective cure was defined as women not experiencing any urine loss on physical activity. Objective cure was defined as no urine leak at cough during a standard urodynamic study. At a mean follow up of 59.2 months, the subjective cure rates were 81.7% and 84.1%; the objective cure rate were 82.6% and 82.5% for the outside-in and inside-out approach, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the procedures. De novo overactive bladder syndrome (10.6% in outside-in and 14.6% in inside-out approach; P = 0.40) and de novo detrusor overactivity (5.8% in outside-in and 15% in inside-out approach; P = 0.11) was also comparable between the two groups. Complications at the fifth year were low and not significantly different among both methods. The outside-in approach and inside-out approach are both safe and effective in treating women with urinary stress incontinence up to 5 years.