Abstract

The hallmark of strategic decisions is their interdependence: competitive advantage requires that these decisions reinforce each other. However, mutual reinforcement requires a synthesis of decisions. There are many strategy tools for analysis but not for synthesis. Performance landscape modeling of decision combinations has its value for academic research but is too complex for practice. This working paper proposes a sequential, judgment-based, qualitative modeling process for strategy synthesis. Whereas performance landscape models use binary, quantitative decision values, and computer simulations, the proposed process uses qualitative values and managerial judgment. By simplifying the synthesis, this working paper contributes to strategy practice.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.