Abstract

The compact multi-transiting planet systems discovered by Kepler challenge planet formation theories. Formation in situ from disks with radial mass surface density, $\Sigma$, profiles similar to the minimum mass solar nebula (MMSN) but boosted in normalization by factors $\gtrsim 10$ has been suggested. We propose that a more natural way to create these planets in the inner disk is formation sequentially from the inside-out via creation of successive gravitationally unstable rings fed from a continuous stream of small (~cm--m size) "pebbles", drifting inwards via gas drag. Pebbles collect at the pressure maximum associated with the transition from a magneto-rotational instability (MRI)-inactive ("dead zone") region to an inner MRI-active zone. A pebble ring builds up until it either becomes gravitationally unstable to form an $\sim 1\ M_\oplus$ planet directly or induces gradual planet formation via core accretion. The planet may undergo Type I migration into the active region, allowing a new pebble ring and planet to form behind it. Alternatively if migration is inefficient, the planet may continue to accrete from the disk until it becomes massive enough to isolate itself from the accretion flow. A variety of densities may result depending on the relative importance of residual gas accretion as the planet approaches its isolation mass. The process can repeat with a new pebble ring gathering at the new pressure maximum associated with the retreating dead zone boundary. Our simple analytical model for this scenario of inside-out planet formation yields planetary masses, relative mass scalings with orbital radius, and minimum orbital separations consistent with those seen by Kepler. It provides an explanation of how massive planets can form with tightly-packed and well-aligned system architectures, starting from typical protoplanetary disk properties.

Highlights

  • A striking property of the Kepler-detected planet candidates (KPC) is the existence of multi-transiting systems with tightly-packed inner planets (STIPs): typically 3–5 planets of radii ∼ 1 − 10 R⊕ in short-period (1–100d) orbits (Fang & Margot 2012)

  • Pebbles collect at the pressure maximum associated with the transition from a magneto-rotational instability (MRI)-inactive (“dead zone”) region to an inner MRI-active zone

  • The process can repeat with a new pebble ring gathering at the new pressure maximum associated with the retreating dead zone boundary

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

A striking property of the Kepler-detected planet candidates (KPC) is the existence of multi-transiting systems with tightly-packed inner planets (STIPs): typically 3–5 planets of radii ∼ 1 − 10 R⊕ in short-period (1–100d) orbits (Fang & Margot 2012). Chiang & Laughlin (2013) used the observed distribution of KPCs to construct a Σ profile of a typical disk that would form such planets, finding it has significantly more solids within ∼ 1 AU than the MMSN They discussed several implications of forming planets from such a disk. Hansen & Murray (2012, 2013) proposed this concentration (∼ 20 M⊕ inside 1 AU) is achieved via migration of small bodies to form an inner enriched disk They considered a standard model for planet formation via oligarchic growth from such a disk. Inward migration of pebbles occurs via gas drag due to the disk’s radial pressure gradient — long recognized as part of the so called “metersize barrier” for planetesimal formation (Weidenschilling 1977; Youdin & Kenyon 2013) This inhibits planet formation in most of the disk, we argue it is key for enabling close-in massive planet formation.

OVERVIEW OF THEORETICAL MODEL
Pebble Formation and Drift to the Inner Disk
Pebble Ring Formation at Inner Disk Pressure Maximum
Via Gravitational Instability
Via Core Accretion
Birth and Migration from a Fixed Parent Pebble Ring
Gap Opening and Dead Zone Retreat
Constraints from the Global Disk Pebble Reservoir
COMPARISON TO KEPLER SYSTEMS
DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call