Abstract

Genotype–phenotype maps link genetic changes to their fitness effect and are thus an essential component of evolutionary models. The map between RNA sequences and their secondary structures is a key example and has applications in functional RNA evolution. For this map, the structural effect of substitutions is well understood, but models usually assume a constant sequence length and do not consider insertions or deletions. Here, we expand the sequence–structure map to include single nucleotide insertions and deletions by using the RNAshapes concept. To quantify the structural effect of insertions and deletions, we generalize existing definitions for robustness and non-neutral mutation probabilities. We find striking similarities between substitutions, deletions and insertions: robustness to substitutions is correlated with robustness to insertions and, for most structures, to deletions. In addition, frequent structural changes after substitutions also tend to be common for insertions and deletions. This is consistent with the connection between energetically suboptimal folds and possible structural transitions. The similarities observed hold both for genotypic and phenotypic robustness and mutation probabilities, i.e. for individual sequences and for averages over sequences with the same structure. Our results could have implications for the rate of neutral and non-neutral evolution.

Highlights

  • The genotype–phenotype relationship is a ‘cornerstone’ [1] of molecular evolution because it captures the structural and functional consequences of mutations

  • The genotype robustness of a sequence is the fraction of mutations which do not lead to a structural change [6]

  • The genotype robustness to insertions and deletions is plotted against the genotype robustness to substitutions for the 500 sequences we collected from the neutral set of shape ‘[[[_[]]_]_]’

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The genotype–phenotype relationship is a ‘cornerstone’ [1] of molecular evolution because it captures the structural and functional consequences of mutations. These mutations can include substitutions as well as insertions and deletions and are the source of variation. The secondary structure is the pattern of base pairs between nucleotides, usually not including pseudoknots. This base pairing pattern can be described on different levels of detail [13,14,15]. In sequence–structure map research, the ViennaRNA package [16] is most commonly used [7,17,18] This program returns structures at the most royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsif J.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call