Abstract

There has been a dramatic increase in the number of insect-specific flaviviruses (ISFs) discovered in the last decade. Historically, these viruses have generated limited interest due to their inability to infect vertebrate cells. This viewpoint has changed in recent years because some ISFs have been shown to enhance or suppress the replication of medically important flaviviruses in co-infected mosquito cells. Additionally, comparative studies between ISFs and medically important flaviviruses can provide a unique perspective as to why some flaviviruses possess the ability to infect and cause devastating disease in humans while others do not. ISFs have been isolated exclusively from mosquitoes in nature but the detection of ISF-like sequences in sandflies and chironomids indicates that they may also infect other dipterans. ISFs can be divided into two distinct phylogenetic groups. The first group currently consists of approximately 12 viruses and includes cell fusing agent virus, Kamiti River virus and Culex flavivirus. These viruses are phylogenetically distinct from all other known flaviviruses. The second group, which is apparently not monophyletic, currently consists of nine viruses and includes Chaoyang virus, Nounané virus and Lammi virus. These viruses phylogenetically affiliate with mosquito/vertebrate flaviviruses despite their apparent insect-restricted phenotype. This article provides a review of the discovery, host range, mode of transmission, superinfection exclusion ability and genomic organization of ISFs. This article also attempts to clarify the ISF nomenclature because some of these viruses have been assigned more than one name due to their simultaneous discoveries by independent research groups.

Highlights

  • All viruses in the genus Flavivirus possess a single-stranded, positive-senseRNA genome of approximately 11 kb [1]

  • Cx. quinquefasciatus infected with Culex flavivirus (CxFV) alone but was detected in the saliva of mosquitoes co-infected with CxFV and West Nile virus (WNV) [63]

  • Experiments performed with field-infected Cx. pipiens revealed that transovarial transmission (TOT) is an efficient mechanism for CxFV persistence [64]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

All viruses in the genus Flavivirus (family Flaviviridae) possess a single-stranded, positive-sense. The genomes of some flaviviruses appear to encode an additional protein as a consequence of ribosomal frameshifting as discussed later in this review. Despite their similar genomic organizations, flaviviruses possess fundamental differences in their host ranges and transmissibilities. Dual-host flaviviruses can be further divided into mosquito/vertebrate and tick/vertebrate viruses. ISFs in the second group phylogenetically affiliate with mosquito/vertebrate flaviviruses and, for the purpose of this review, will be referred to as dual-host affiliated ISFs (dISFs). Species names are colorcoded as follows: cISFs—blue; dISFs—green; NKV flaviviruses—red; mosquito/vertebrate flaviviruses—purple; tick/vertebrate flaviviruses—black

Classical Insect-Specific Flaviviruses
In Vitro and in Vivo Replication Potential in Vertebrates and Arthropod Cells
Transmission
Competitive Interaction between cISFs and Dual-Host Flaviviruses
Genome Sequencing and Phylogeny
Ribosomal Frameshifting
Predicted Polyprotein Cleavage Sites
Dual-Host Affiliated Insect-Specific Flaviviruses
In Vitro and in Vivo Replication Potential in Vertebrates and Arthropods
Competitive Interaction between dISFs and Dual-Host Flaviviruses
Closing Remarks and Future Research
Findings
Conflicts of Interest

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.