Abstract

Several studies have shown that insectivorous birds are attracted to herbivore‐damaged trees even when they cannot see or smell the actual herbivores or their feces. However, it often remained an open question whether birds are attracted by herbivore‐induced changes in leaf odor or in leaf light reflectance or by both types of changes. Our study addressed this question by investigating the response of great tits (Parus major) and blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) to Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) damaged by pine sawfly larvae (Diprion pini). We released the birds individually to a study booth, where they were simultaneously offered a systemically herbivore‐induced and a noninfested control pine branch. In the first experiment, the birds could see the branches, but could not smell them, because each branch was kept inside a transparent, airtight cylinder. In the second experiment, the birds could smell the branches, but could not see them, because each branch was placed inside a nontransparent cylinder with a mesh lid. The results show that the birds were more attracted to the herbivore‐induced branch in both experiments. Hence, either type of the tested cues, the herbivore‐induced visual plant cue alone as well as the olfactory cues per se, is attractive to the birds.

Highlights

  • Plants infested by arthropod herbivores have evolved a plethora of defensive responses (Howe & Jander, 2008; Walling, 2000)

  • The identity of the branch pair was used as a random factor. (b) Least square means estimates and standard errors (SE) of the analyzed independent variables

  • Our study shows that it is possible that great and blue tits can distinguish a systemically herbivore-induced pine branch from an uninfested pine branch by just the visual cues of the branches as well as by the olfactory cues per se

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Plants infested by arthropod herbivores have evolved a plethora of defensive responses (Howe & Jander, 2008; Walling, 2000). Orienting predators can potentially use infestation-induced changes in leaf light reflection to locate their herbivorous prey in addition to herbivore-induced changes in plant odor. We demonstrated that great and blue tits were attracted to branches of Scots pine, which were systemically infested by sawfly larvae; the systemically induced pine branches displayed an odor different from noninfested pine and showed reduced light reflectance (Mäntylä et al, 2017). From our results of this previous study, we could not yet conclude whether the birds distinguished between systemically infested and noninfested pine by plant visual cues (light reflectance) or by odor (HIPVs). We designed two experiments, which exposed great and blue tits to either the visual or the olfactory cues of a Scots pine branch systemically induced by pine sawfly larvae (Figure 1)

| MATERIAL AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call