Abstract

Large outdoor cage tests were conducted in 1963 and 1964 with apholate, metepa, and 4 bifunctional aziridine chemicals against the house fly, Musca domestica L. These tests evaluated the effectiveness of 5 apholate formulations and granular sugar baits of the 6 chemicals under variable environmental conditions and moderately high house fly populations. The performance of apholate formulations ranked in this order: liquid and granular baits were most effective; ribbon treatments were slightly better than string; and residual treatments on plywood were least effective. The greater effectiveness of baits was associated with good attractancy and more rapid availability of the sterilant. The use of a humectant, like glycerin, on strings and baits improved performance. High sterility was obtained with each of the 6 chemicals as granular sugar baits. The performance of baits was affected, however, by method of placement, fly age, and envhonmental conditions. A broadcast method of exposure was most effective, but resulted in a more rapid loss of the sterilant. Metepa and a bis aziridine diphosphaspiro dioxide compound, which were ⅓ as effective as apholate in the laboratory, gave promising results at field concentrations.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call